Ep. 109: The Biggest Barriers to Finding Good Staff

 

If you survey dentists (which we do), staffing issues will always come up as one of the biggest sources of problems and stress—and it’s only gotten worse in recent years. So this week, special guest Jeff Santone comes on to discuss the biggest barriers to building a good team and what adjustments you should make to be successful in today’s environment. 

Topics:

:11 I can’t find (or keep) any good staff

14:12 – I’m understaffed but can’t afford to hire more people

Links:

The MGE New Patient Workshop - https://www.newpatients.net

DDS Success (coupon code RX269) - https://ddssuccess.com

Fees & Plans Analysis - https://www.mgeonline.com/fees-and-plans

Wasserman Guide – https://wasserman-medical.com/product-category/dental

 

Listen to full episode :

Have a question for Jeff?

Fill out the form and he will get back to you.

Ask Jeff a Question

Questions From This Episode

What does Jeff Santone say is the top staffing complaint from new clients, and how is it different from what practice owners dealt with in the past?

The number one complaint now is simply that nobody is applying at all, a shift from pre-pandemic years when finding qualified staff was the harder challenge but applicants themselves weren't scarce. He attributes this partly to a genuine labor supply shift, with projections showing the overall labor pool dipping below current levels by around 2032.

Why does Jeff Santone say staying within the recommended payroll percentage can actually mean a practice is dangerously understaffed?

Total payroll (excluding the owner doctor and associates) generally shouldn't exceed about 22.5 percent of collections. But a practice heavily in-network with PPOs that's collecting $100,000 a month might actually be performing closer to $180,000 worth of real dentistry, so capping payroll against the discounted collected amount means staffing is calibrated to a much smaller workload than what's actually being delivered.

What did Jeff Blumberg find when comparing a client's hygienist job posting to local corporate listings?

The client was offering $55 an hour, phenomenal money by pre-pandemic standards, and getting zero responses, while five corporate practices in the same zip code were advertising $60 to $65 an hour plus $4,000 signing bonuses. Both were facing the same inflationary pressure, but only one had actually checked what the real local market required.

Why does Jeff Santone recommend over-hiring rather than hiring exactly one person per opening?

He describes a New Patient Workshop exercise where attendees interview three strong-seeming candidates, two who perform well on a working-interview test and one who quits by lunchtime, and most people instinctively pick just one of the two good candidates. His point: you can't fully predict who will actually work out long-term, so hiring both when you find multiple strong candidates keeps a practice from being caught flat-footed when someone unexpectedly leaves.

What do Jeff Blumberg and Jeff Santone say is often the real fix when a practice insists its core problem is "not enough staff"?

They point to inefficiencies elsewhere in the practice, like only converting a fraction of diagnosed treatment into completed treatment, or a weak new patient call conversion rate, as the actual source of the problem, since fixing those often generates enough additional revenue to afford the staff the practice already needs. They also point to heavy PPO participation as directly suppressing the revenue available to pay competitive wages in the first place.

Episode Transcript

Previous
Previous

Ep. 110: Proofing Your Practice Against Cancellations

Next
Next

Ep. 108: Finding the Right Office Manager for Your Practice